Experience and successful expert witnesses are now often using demonstrative evidence such as powerpoints, models, videos, animations, photographs, 3D laser data, etc. during their direct examination. This demonstrative evidence needs to be presented to counsel and approved by the Judge prior to its use. Effective demonstrative evidence can turn a dry recitation of the science [...]
While many expert witnesses and trial attorneys focus their time on prepping for cross-examination, the key to success often lies in a powerful persuasive direct examination. Expert witnesses want to work with retaining counsel to: Humanize the expert. Lay out an interesting and persuasive narrative. Diffuse any damaging information that is likely to arise during [...]
North Carolina Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under Rule 26(b)(4) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, experts in North Carolina may only be subject to deposition, or any form of discovery beyond interrogatories exchanged by the parties, upon court order. Such an order will be granted where a party’s disclosures [...]
Michigan Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under Rule 2.302(4)(a)(ii) of the Michigan Court Rules, experts who are expected to testify at trial may be deposed. Michigan laws and rules do not specify a time limit for depositions, but Rule 2.306(B)(2) provides that the court may increase or decrease the time allowed for [...]
Georgia Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(ii) of the Georgia Code, experts who are expected to testify at trial may be deposed in the same manner as any other witness. Oral depositions are governed by § 9-11-30, which does not provide a general time limit for depositions, but does state [...]
Ohio Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Ohio rules and cases are not explicit regarding the availability of deposition for experts. However, it seems that most authorities on Ohio law treat the vague reference to further discovery of testifying experts in Rule 26(B)(5)(b) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure as making depositions [...]
Pennsylvania Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under Rule 4003.5(a)(2) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, experts may only be subject to deposition “[u]pon cause shown.” Such a finding of cause appears to be exceedingly rare in Pennsylvania. For an example of a Pennsylvania case in which sufficient cause was shown to [...]
New York Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”) Section 3101(d)(1)(iii), depositions and interrogatories of experts (or any form of discovery other than that provided for in CPLR Section 3101(d)(1)(i), discussed below) are only available on a showing of special circumstances. A court will generally [...]
Attorneys and the expert witnesses they have retained are facing an increasing number of Daubert challenges. While many of these challenges are legitimate, increasingly “Hail Mary” Daubert motions are being filed by counsel. These motions have little or no chance of success, but are a drain on the resources of counsel and the court. What [...]
The United States District Court, D. Nevada. In the case of SCOTT L. WALKER, JR., Plaintiff, v. SPIKE'S TACTICAL, LLC, et. al., Defendants. Case No. 2:13-cv-01923-RFB-PAL dealt with the issue of how much of a fee is reasonable for a neurologist expert witness. The case arose out of an injury during the use of a [...]