The state of Nevada does not follow either the Daubert or Frye test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. Higgs v. State, 222 P.3d 648 (Nev. 2010). Instead, Nevada follows its state statute, N.R.S. 50.275, and utilizes Daubert as persuasive authority. Id. The statute reads that if scientific or technical testimony will help [...]
The state of Nebraska follows the Daubert test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. State v. Mason, 709 N.W.2d 638 (Neb. 2006). This test is only applicable in situations where the expert’s testimony “involves scientific or specialized knowledge.” Id. The overall purpose of this test is to perform an “assessment whether the reasoning [...]
The state of Montana follows the Daubert test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. State v. Southern, 980 P.2d 3 (Mont. 1999). This test focuses on the reliability of an expert’s testimony. Id. Under this test, there are four factors that the court should use to help determine whether the expert’s testimony is [...]
The state of Missouri does not follow either the Daubert or Frye tests for expert witness admissibility. Bailey v. Cameron Mut. Ins. Co., 122 S.W.3d 599 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003). Instead, Missouri follows the state statute regarding the admissibility of expert witness testimony, which is § 490.065 of Missouri’s Rules of Evidence. Mo. Ann. [...]
The state of Mississippi follows the Daubert test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. Investor Resource Services, Inc. v. Cato, 15 So.3d 412 (Miss. 2009). This test is focused on establishing the reliability of the expert’s testimony. Id. Under this test, the party offering the expert’s testimony must show that the expert’s testimony [...]
The state of Minnesota follows the Frye-Mack test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. State v. Hull, 788 N.W.2d 91 (Minn. 2010). This test has two prongs that must be passed before expert testimony can be admitted. Id. The first prong is “whether experts in the field widely share the view that the results [...]
The state of Massachusetts follows the Daubert test for expert witness admissibility. Com v. DiCicco, 25 N.E.3d 859 (Mass. 2015). This test applies to expert testimony that involves “conclusions based on personal observation or clinical experience.” Id. Under this test, in order for expert testimony to be admissible, the expert’s testimony has to “have [...]
The state of Maryland follows the Frye test for expert witness admissibility. Savage v. State, 166 A.3d 183 (Md. 2017). This test requires that for expert testimony to be admissible the underlying “basis of that opinion must be shown to be generally accepted as reliable within the expert’s particular scientific field.” Id. If an [...]
The state of Maine does not follow the Daubert or Frye test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony, but instead follows the Williams test. State v. Bickart, 963 A.2d 183 (Me. 2009). This test requires that the court find the expert’s testimony to be “sufficiently reliable to be held relevant.” Id. To determine [...]
The state of Louisiana follows the Daubert test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. State v. Francois, 134 So.3d 42 (La. Ct. App. 2014). Under this test, the court should consider: “(1) whether the theory or technique can be and has been tested; (2) whether the theory or technique has been subjected to [...]